going back to that thread last year about quality of dance education and training vs the cost, there was just an excellent article on the bbc about Americans' tendency to think that a bottle of wine tastes better if it costs more. when offered two glasses of the same wine, they will tend to claim with confidence that the one they were told was more expensive tastes significantly better.
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7187577.stm
is a link to the article...
K
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7187577.stm
is a link to the article...
K
-
Re: the cost of a bottle of wine
Mon, January 14, 2008 - 11:41 AMThanks Karl - creative way to continue a vital conversation.
I would say that this does relate to any activity we participate in.... maybe not necessarily just financial, but anything we've invested more of ourselves in seems to be more worthwhile - we appreciate what we've really worked for. A bottle (to keep the wine reference) I've scrimped and waited for is a success I can enjoy in many ways. On the other hand, I'm grateful for the cheap wine when I just want a drink. It seems like they both, simply, have their place.
Perhaps the misconceptions come in when we assume that because we have to invest more for something that the ...er, distributor or creator has invested just as much. Granted we get out of it what we put into it ourselves - we can see deeper into anything and get what we need if we really give to it. The question I'd ask, then, are things of better quality if the creator has invested more into it? I can invest a lot into making a simple batch of cheap soup, and also invest very little into making something that appears more extravagant... I don't know, like grilled salmon.
The following question: If things are worth more due to their initial investment, how do we come to see the initial investment? This is usually blind to the buyer, unless they have a personal experience with the individual. It seems if a CI teacher feels they invest a lot, perhaps more than the average teacher, that making it affordable at first could generate more opportunities for such a personal experience.
Yet, I suppose, the market seems to depend more on the investment and desires of the buyers than the creators... ain't it always the way....... HOW TO ENTICE PEOPLE TO TRY A NEW FLAVOR? :) (I'm obviously horrible with metaphors.... bear with me, I apologize) (lol at self)
warmly,
Lynn -
-
Re: the cost of a bottle of wine
Thu, January 17, 2008 - 6:58 AMonly 21 participants
While i am a free thinker.. th einformation is important because most people are NOT. thus when we package and sell.. whatever we need tosell.... we must thinkabout the 'heads' of those from whom we desire financing. Are they independent thinkers? Are they passive.. if it costs a lot it must be good thinkers?
mayeb we can get higher prices from soem for the same event or class or grant application.
Thank you for stimulating my thinking.
-
-
Re: the cost of a bottle of wine
Mon, January 14, 2008 - 6:57 PMi have nto read the article.
I am an independent thinker. I dont go by that kind of stuff.
In actuality I often choose wine by label picture or country and am surprised good and bad.
I really like Purple Moon chardonnay recently.
I belive that there are many free independent thinkers who ar ento swayed by price in determining if they like wine or not.
-
Re: the cost of a bottle of wine
Thu, January 17, 2008 - 8:09 AMTaste...which teacher do you like better? Using a simple variable like cost, is not necessarily effective. A cheap long class is not necessarily a good deal, maybe just a longer waste of time.
to continue the metaphor...
I like Scotch and have a bottle of Laphroaig 30 which costs significantly more than Laphroaig 10, which I like better. -
-
Re: the cost of a bottle of wine
Tue, March 11, 2008 - 9:06 PMever try Auchentoshan? That's my favorite, and it's one of the least expensive, under $25.
-